Showing posts with label Africa. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Africa. Show all posts

Thursday, 11 December 2025

Afro Leo

Africa achieves a landmark outcome: WIPO’s historic new Treaty to combat biopiracy


By Wend Wendland[1]

 

African plants, marine life and microbes have frequently been targeted by companies bioprospecting for new medicines, cosmetics and agricultural products – often without prior and informed consent, acknowledgement and benefit-sharing, a practice known as ‘biopiracy’.[2]


It was for this reason that African countries were at the tip of the spear in a decades-long struggle to introduce an important change to patent procedure that resulted finally in a new Treaty adopted by all the members of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) at a Diplomatic Conference in May last year: the WIPO Treaty on Intellectual Property, Genetic Resources and Associated Traditional Knowledge.


For many years, an intergovernmental committee of WIPO (known as the ‘IGC’) conducted the negotiations that led ultimately to the Treaty’s adoption.[3]


What the Treaty says

The most significant change brought about by the Treaty is that it requires patent applicants to disclose the origin or source of genetic resources and associated traditional knowledge their inventions are based on.

 

This new disclosure obligation will lead to greater transparency about the commercial use of a country’s biodiversity and what benefits are being created and for whom, triggering inquiries into whether national access and benefit-sharing regimes have been complied with – and, if not, this information could lead to benefit-sharing that might not otherwise have occurred. Provider countries, Indigenous Peoples and local communities will then stand to gain a greater share of the monetary and non-monetary benefits that arise from the commercialization of their resources. 


In this way, the Treaty contributes to environmental justice.

 

Further, specific language proposed by Indigenous Peoples’s representatives resonates throughout the text, and they will play a role in the Treaty’s implementation. In this way, the Treaty contributes to social justice and procedural equity.

 

This new transparency requirement will also help reduce uncertainty about the validity of patents over bio-based inventions. This will lead to higher quality patents and greater trust in the patent system.

 

Africa’s leading role

 

A stand-out feature of the Treaty is that it is the first intellectual property treaty for which developing countries were the proponents. For one of the first times in the history of international intellectual property law, they were not policy-takers but policy-makers. This may be intellectual property’s first truly pro-development treaty.

 

Indeed, developing countries, as well as Indigenous Peoples and local communities, called for such a new patent disclosure requirement for over 25 years and they in particular have hailed its adoption.

 

Africa played a leading role in the long and winding journey to the Treaty. I am reminded in particular of the contributions over the years of figures like Philip Owade from Kenya who chaired the IGC from 2009 to 2011, Vivienne Katjiuongua from Namibia who chaired one of the two key negotiating tracks at the Diplomatic Conference and negotiators such as Yonah Seleti, the late Tom Suchanandan and Shumi Pango (South Africa); Pierre du Plessis (Namibia); Catherine Bunyassi Kahuria (Kenya), Chidi Oguamanam and Ruth Okediji (Nigeria); Paul Kuruk (Ghana); Amadou Tankoano (Niger), Mohamed Bakir (Algeria) and Georges-Rémi Namekong (African Union), to name only a few.

 

Prospects for the Treaty’s success

 

Africa is leading the charge too in bringing the Treaty into force.

 

Among the 44 countries that signed the Treaty within the one-year period allowed for signing, the majority are African.[4]

Signing the Treaty does not mean countries are bound by it, however. Countries become bound by treaties when they either ratify or accede to them.

 

This Treaty will come into force three months after 15 countries have either ratified or acceded to it.

 

So far, two countries have joined the Treaty (Malawi and Uganda).

 

The influence of the Treaty on the continuing negotiations in WIPO on the protection of traditional knowledge more broadly and traditional cultural expressions is at this stage unclear, yet expectations are high.

 

It is too soon to make predictions about the success of the Treaty – however that may be judged.

 

While the Treaty’s adoption last year was a momentous milestone in the evolution of the patent system, it is critical that the Treaty comes into force as soon as possible.

 

Countries should therefore now show their commitment to the Treaty by joining it and bringing it to life.

 



[1] Wend Wendland was for many years a Director of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). He is now an independent expert working at the intersection of intellectual property and global issues such as biodiversity, cultural heritage, agriculture, health and Indigenous Peoples. He is also an Adjunct Professor at the Law Faculty, University of Cape Town, South Africa. He is contactable at wend@wendwendland.com and his website is at https://wendwendland.com

[2] African Centre for Biosafety, ‘Pirating African Heritage: The Pillaging Continues’, 2009; Jay McGown ‘Out of Africa: Mysteries of Access and Benefit Sharing’ (Edmonds Institute, 2006).

[3] WIPO’s Intergovernmental Committee on Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore (the IGC)

[4] See https://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/treaties/en/docs/pdf/gratk.pdf

 

 

The author’s book The Journey to the WIPO Treaty on Genetic Resources and Associated Traditional Knowledge: Policy, Process and People (Edward Elgar, November 2025) provides an insider’s account of the colourful and eventful journey to the Treaty’s adoption from the first proposal at WIPO for a new patent disclosure requirement in 1999 to the adoption of the Treaty 25 years later. It analyses the Treaty and its negotiating history, lifting the curtain on how its adoption by consensus was achieved, identifying the key individuals involved and providing insights into how the Treaty’s ultimate success may be judged and achieved. The book is now available on the Edward Elgar Publishing website. For a limited period, get a 35% discount by using the code WEND35 at checkout.


Read More

Tuesday, 12 August 2025

Afro Leo

Respecting the Lens: Protecting Africa’s Photographic Legacy

In a world where images can be downloaded, reposted, and circulated globally in seconds, the artistry and rights of photographers are too often overlooked. Behind every image lies the vision, effort, and lived experience of its creator. When these works are used without permission, they are not just stolen they are stripped of their context, meaning, and economic value.


A Legacy in Focus: Sam Nzima and the Hector Pieterson Photograph


Few photographs are as iconic, or as powerful, as the image Sam Nzima took of 12-year-old Hector Pieterson during the Soweto Uprising of 1976. It is a photograph that moved the world, exposing the brutality of apartheid and galvanising international opposition.


But Nzima’s journey with that image was not only about history, it was also about ownership. For decades, he fought for recognition and control over the use of his photograph. Without his permission, it was reproduced in countless publications, sometimes stripped of his name, sometimes used in ways that diluted its meaning. His struggle was a reminder that even legendary works by African creators are vulnerable to misuse, particularly abroad.


Protecting this image is not about locking it away. It’s about ensuring it is treated with dignity, that it continues to tell the story it was meant to tell, and that Nzima’s legacy inspires future generations of photographers to use their craft to record history and to insist on the respect and rights they deserve.


The Law Is on the Side of the Creator


In South Africa, photographs are protected as artistic works from the moment they are created. The author, the photographer, holds the copyright unless it has been assigned or falls under specific exceptions in the Copyright Act.


Using a photograph without permission, whether intentionally or not, constitutes infringement. That means reproducing it in a book, posting it on a website, or even using it in a marketing campaign without the creator’s consent is unlawful.


The remedies can include damages, royalties, and court orders to stop further misuse. But beyond legal enforcement lies a moral responsibility: to honour the labour and creativity of the person behind the lens.


Why This Matters for African Creators


African photographers often face two hurdles:

  1. Visibility without control – Their work travels globally but is monetised by others.
  2. Lack of enforcement resources – Many cannot afford the time or expense of pursuing infringement abroad.

The result is a one-way flow of value, African creativity enriching others while its originators are sidelined.


Respecting copyright is not simply a matter of compliance. It’s about cultural integrity. Every unauthorised use erodes the link between an image and its creator, and chips away at the ability of future Sam Nzimas to make a living from their craft.


A Call to Action


If you use photographs, especially those telling Africa’s stories, ask permission. Credit the creator. Pay for the licence. If you are a photographer, know your rights and assert them. The stories you capture are part of our shared history, and your name and livelihood deserve to be tied to them.


Sam Nzima’s lens brought a defining moment of South African history into focus. Let us ensure that future generations of African photographers can do the same, confident that their work will be respected, their rights upheld, and their legacy protected.

Read More

Friday, 16 April 2021

Chijioke Ifeoma Okorie

World IP Day 2021 Free Workshop Event - IP & SMEs: Taking your ideas to market

In celebration of World Intellectual Property Day 2021, the Centre for IP Law at the University of Pretoria together with Adams & Adams Attorneys will host a free Workshop on 28 April 2021.

The theme for World IP Day 2021 is IP & SMEs: Taking your ideas to market. To that end, the free workshop will focus on how small- and medium-sized enterprises can benefit from using the IP system and other topics such as IP valuation, IP finance, IP infringement and IP licensing. There will be a free IP consultation in the form of a Q&A session for SMEs and individuals interested in learning about the best ways to take their ideas to market and protect their IP assets.


Confirmed speakers so far include:

Pieter Visagie, partner at Adams & Adams specialising in the drafting of patent specifications and the filing and prosecution of patent and designs applications both locally and abroad.

Dr Chijioke Okorie, lecturer and researcher at Centre for Intellectual Property Law, University of Pretoria. Chijioke is a copyright law expert and the author of the book, Multi-sided Music Platforms and the Law: Copyright, Law and Policy in Africa (Routledge, 2020).

Eugene Honey, Partner at Adams and Adams, has specialised in Trade Marks and Copyright matters, as well as Commercial IP matters including Franchising and Licensing, IP valuations, IP Due Diligence and IP portfolio management since 1991. He acts for many local and international trade mark Proprietors, Licensors and Franchisors. He has been on the EXCO and has been the legal advisor to the Franchise Association of South Africa since 2002.

Lisa van Zuydam, Senior Associate at Adams & Adams, is a qualified attorney and trade mark practitioner specialising in litigation relating to trade marks, copyright, passing-off, unlawful competition, domain name disputes, company and business name objections and advertising and regulatory issues in South Africa and across Africa. She advises and represents organisations of all sizes from small South African businesses to large multi-national organisations with substantial portfolios.

The Centre for IP Law and Adams & Adams teams hope to see you there!

Date: Wednesday, 28 April 2021

Time: 11AM (SAST/GMT+2)

Cost: Free (Registration is required)

Platform: Zoom

Please register here. [To submit your questions and request free intellectual property consultation, please fill out the form with the information requested. The speakers will help answer your questions on the day]










Read More

Tuesday, 29 January 2019

Darren Olivier

Update: Brexit implications for Africa

Nick Youngson CC BY-SA 3.0 Alpha Stock Images
The UKIPO has been helpful in providing regular updates on what would happen to intellectual property rights of those with interests in the UK post Brexit, in the event of a no-deal. The latest update published recently sets out the various rights and explains what would happen to each:

  1. - Continued protection of registered trade marks and designs in the UK
  2. - Continued protection of unregistered Community designs
  3. - Correspondence addresses and confidentiality for UK trade marks and designs

The implications are, generally, that existing EU rights would remain in force and that provisions for a separate right covering the UK would be created, with minimal administrative burden. Despite these assurances though, many EU rights holders have already seen fit to re-file or at least reconsider their portfolio as it applies to the UK. The uptick in national UK national filings shows the trend and African rights holders would do well to consider the same approach.

The debate and uncertainty over Brexit is tedious yet remains captivating and crucially important for anyone with trade, business or personal interests in Great Britain. Most countries and many citizens of Africa fall into that category, and even on the continent's most southern tip it is also a potentially very emotive topic.  Only the bold or mischievous raise the topic at dinner tables. It is treated with the same trepidation as religion, abortion and politics for the topic has the same capacity to interrogate fundamentals.

When Great Britain catches a cold, Africa gets pneumonia, as the saying goes. GB is one of Africa's most important trading partners. Any slight, let alone momentous (even if temporary), change to the economic climate in GB affects Africa.

This truth underlines the concerns raised by South Africa's trade minister Rob Davies in a recent BusinessReport news article in which he warns of the potential devastating impact a no-deal Brexit would have on the South African economy. Highlighting the wine industry which produces 40% of its export for the UK market, he explains that the European Partnership Agreement reached with Europe in 2016 saw South Africa's duty free quota to Europe increase from 48 to 110 million litres. The implication, it appears, is that this progress in trade for South Africa would be jeopardised. This is despite, British High Commissioner Nigel Casey's assurances in late November last year.

In the same article Dawie Roodt and Mike Schussler, both leading economists, warn that if Brexit is disruptive, even a small contraction in the British economy would be hard felt in South Africa, citing exchange rate fluctuations and trade implications. However, Schussler admits admits that the effect if difficult to predict, and impossible to influence.

For earlier posts and commentary on Brexit implications for IP owners in Africa, click Afro-IP posts here and here.

Posted by Darren Olivier


Read More

Monday, 4 July 2016

Afro Leo

Guest Post: AFRICA – A land of opportunity to brand holders and counterfeiters alike

In this guest post, Vanessa Ferguson unpacks some of the key considerations and strategies for dealing with counterfeits on the African continent: 

Africa has seen a vast increase in investment and growth over the past 50 years and many companies have already mobilized to capture this emerging demand. 

With the growing investment, Africa is being increasingly targeted as a market for counterfeit goods and merchandise as a result of the escalating urban populations’ growing demand for many goods not widely available, as well as the lack of means to buy them. 

Whilst the demand is growing for branded goods, and the instances of infringing and counterfeit goods are on the increase, the various Intellectual Property Rights protection measures available to brand holders differ from country to country and remain largely inadequate in most African countries and vary from region to region.  As a result, a “one size fits all” anti-counterfeiting strategy cannot be easily applied or adopted in covering the key regions and territories in Africa. 

Furthermore, the market structure in Africa differs substantially from first world markets, such as Europe and America, and, as such, the best practices developed and applied in these territories cannot necessarily be adopted and applied in Africa with the same results and consequences. 

A key understanding of Africa and its nuances is important in establishing an effective anti-counterfeiting strategy .  Although modern trade is growing, this is still small and under developed outside of South Africa.  The most common and popular trading channels in Africa are the simple table top or small “spaza” shops, which are individually owned and managed by local entrepreneurs, set up on the side of the road or in local markets in order to capture the passing trade.  These businesses are supported and supplied by an equally efficient network and well-developed informal distribution structure.   Furthermore, informal cross-border trade is important to Africa and more than 43% of Africans are involved in informal cross-border trade, which contributes a large portion of the economic growth, job creation and job security.  

As a result, counterfeit goods are increasingly being sold, transported and distributed across African borders using these well-developed and largely uncontrolled informal trade routes. 
 
An effective African anti-counterfeiting strategy should therefore not only be focused on the countries of relevance to the brand holders, but also the neighbouring territories, taking into account the retail structure, main trade channels and distribution routes in Africa. 

As an initial step, brand holders should ensure that their primary trade marks are registered - not only in the main countries in which their goods or services are provided -but also in neighbouring territories.  Without the existence of a registered trade mark, it is almost impossible to act against counterfeiters in Africa, especially in those territories where common law rights or protection of well-known trade marks is not recognised.  Copycat infringement is on the increase, where infringers will adopt a label that is a colourable imitation of the original label.  As such, consideration should be given to the registration of the labels for the primary products to provide statutory protection against the use of a similar label or get-up. 

Although Customs remains an important and critical element to an effective anti-counterfeiting strategy, the relevance and success of actions by customs differs from region to region in Africa.  Unfortunately not all territories have established Customs practices focused on the registration of brands and detention of suspect counterfeit goods and it is only possible to record brands with Customs in a handful of countries.  Where formal customs recordal procedures are available, such as in South Africa, Mauritius, Ethiopia, Morocco, Tunisia & Egypt, brand holders should record their brands.   In other territories, an informal strategy can be adopted for the identification and to support the notification of suspect counterfeit goods.  This has been proven to be effective in key African territories including Namibia, Zambia, Mozambique, Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda, Rwanda, Ghana and Nigeria. 

A strategy focused primarily on customs recordals and actions alone is not sufficient or recommended in Africa, particularly due to the inconsistencies in inspections and measures to stop counterfeits at the ports, airports and borders differ from region to region.  In each region it is necessary to assess and work with local police services and regulatory bodies, for example NAFDAC in Nigeria and the Anti-Counterfeiting Agency in Kenya, that have the capacity and infrastructure to tackle counterfeit goods in the region.

Steps should also be taken by brand holders to formalise and strengthen their own distribution channels in the region and across borders.  Based on the demand for products, the informal distribution channels and methods are strong and well-entrenched in Africa, facilitating the trade in counterfeit and parallel goods.  Brand holders should firsthand build up understanding and knowledge of these distribution and retail channels in order to infiltrate and effectively act against key counterfeit role players.  Such investigations and actions, however, take time, money and patience.  A long-term approach, with consistent supported actions against retailers and suppliers alike, should be implemented, with a view to obtaining or extracting information on the source and supply of these goods.

In each territory, brand holders should adopt a zero-tolerance approach to anti-counterfeiting and take action to the full extent of the law in the respective regions.  In such cases, where appropriate and feasible, brand holders should institute criminal or civil proceedings against known and identified offenders, especially in the case of repeat offenders or where other extenuating circumstances justify the spend and time taken in bringing these matters to finality. The continued prosecution of offenders will not only build up a valuable precedent of case law, but will also send a clear message to the market of the severity and consequences of dealing in counterfeit goods.

Read More

Monday, 12 October 2015

IPcommentator

African Ministers to convene for a conference on IP

'IP for an Emerging Africa' is the theme of a three-day conference scheduled for November 3 – 5, 2015 in Dakar, Senegal. The event is jointly organised by the Japan Patent Office and WIPO, in cooperation with the African Union and the Government of the Republic of Senegal. [Says Afro Leo: “Those following the progress of African countries in the Global Innovation Index will notice that the host has done well, again, alongside Mauritius and South Africa.”]

According to the planners, this event will “highlight the relevance of IP as an engine for promoting creativity, innovation, scientific and technological transformation of African economies”. 

It is packed with sessions discussing, among other things, how to create a balanced IP regime which enables innovation; the role of the patent system; modernising IPOffices; R&D and IP; and the creative industries.  

Special guests and panellists include:
  • Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma, Chairperson of the Africa Union Commission;
  • Kunihiko Shimano, Director-General, Trial and Appeal Department of the Japan Patent Office;
  • H.E. Mr. Macky Sall, President of the Republic of Senegal;
  • H. E. Mrs. Ameenah Gurib-Fakim, President of the Republic of Mauritius;
  • Francis Gurry, Director General of WIPO;
  • Martial De Paul Ikounga, Commissioner for Human Resources, Science and Technology at the African Union; and
  • Catherine A. Odora-Hoppers, Professor at the University of South Africa.

[Afro Leo thinks this is the sort of gathering where one may get the latest on the Pan-Africa Intellectual Property Office (PAIPO)]

This Leo also recognises Nicola Searle (the Katonomist), who will be moderating a panel discussion on capturing value through IP in the fashion design industry. He must say that Nicola gave him the idea behind an Africa creative industries event in London two years ago.

There might still be places left, if you would like to attend. Afro Leo would welcome feedback or IP-related gossip from anyone attending.
Read More