
Monday, 30 March 2015

Monday, 19 May 2014
The dilemma: Will more cinemas solve Nollywood's biggest problem?
In summary, Ms. Oduok doesn't believe that investing in more cinemas (or movie theatres for U.S folks) is the key to resolving Nollywood's distribution problem. One of her qualms is that the existing cinemas are heavily pushing Hollywood content to the consumers. [Afro Leo thinks: "Unfortunate, maybe that's where the money is."]
Indeed, mobile technology is booming across Africa and new ways (e.g. here and here) to distribute content are emerging (or even evolving). We also know about the widely-publicised problems such as poor infrastructure (and here). [See Tim Katlic's oAfrica for an A-Z guide]
Based on available online evidence, this Leo can agree that Hollywood content is currently enjoying the
Afro Leo is wondering: Would it be fair to include a condition, in the agreement with a cinema operator in receipt of public funds, which requires the operator to screen a minimum number of Nollywood films? This Leo is not entirely sure if this is feasible, not least, because the consumer is king. [The UK (here and here) is not that far off from what this Leo has in mind - though theirs are grants] However, he is aware that Nigeria already operates a regime, in its oil and gas sector, commonly referred to as local content; perhaps, that could form the blueprint for any such policy seeking to advance the best interests of Nollywood. [Afro Leo couldn't just resist to add that it should be evidence-based policymaking]
More questions than answers....
(1) How can Nollywood or policymakers properly encourage people away from DVDs to viewing in cinemas? Would this help, in any way, in the fight against piracy? [Afro Leo tells us to spare a thought for the internationally acclaimed movie, Half of a Yellow Sun - yet to be released in Nigeria. Happy pirates!]
(2) If the industry and policymakers decide to back the common model seen in developed countries, would this not affect millions who cannot afford a cinema ticket? [Afro Leo scratching his head, thinking: "Surely, this would lead to more demand for pirated copies; how can Nollywood abandon the model that made it famous?"]
(3) Is it that the majority of Nollywood films lack the quality or compatibility for cinema releases?
Conclusion
One can easily see that there are difficult decisions to be made here and that this is not helped by the fact that film piracy is here to stay. Time to think outside the box?
Anyway, if the above observation (i.e. that Hollywood is having the lion share) is factual, then it looks like the public funding schemes might not be all that helpful in addressing Nollywood's biggest problem: distribution.
Nollywood rated third globally in revenue earnings, says NEXIM Bank MD, here, but how did it come up with that?
Saturday, 22 January 2011

Nollywood Takes on New York (and the rest of the US)
Those of us who follow intellectual property on the continent are no strangers to stories from Nollywood about filmmakers’ efforts to fight the rampant piracy of their films. But here’s a new twist, brought to us by a report from PIIPA, Nollywood has taken it’s battle across the ocean to the United States of America.
Manning the US front for Nollywood are the African Artists Collaborative, a non-profit that assists African artists with US copyright registration and legal help, and the Filmmakers Association of Nigeria, USA (FAN USA), which founded the African Artists Collaborative.
The report expresses the the need for these organizations in the recognition that “for the first time ever, Africans have been able to create a commercial product which has been accepted by large niche markets in the United States, the Caribbean and Europe.” Afro-Leo supposes that these large niches are the large diaspora populations as she has often, and only, seen Nollywood films available in hair shops and hair braiding salons, the most visible business establishments of the African Diaspora population.
The Positives
So far, it seems that the African Artists Collaborative and FAN USA have been able to assist quite a number of African artists through copyright registrations, DMCA take-downs, information about civil suits, and pushes for criminal enforcement.
Copyright Registration
Nigeria and the United States are both members of the standard copyright treaties. Thus, all films are copyrighted in both countries without any formal registration processes. However, registration in the US offers some important benefits, including a presumption of a valid copyright and the ability to receive higher damages at trial.
PIIPA helps match African artists with pro bono lawyers who assist the artists with registration of their works. Over 100 films have been registered. An interesting adaptation of something familiar to the trademark world, a publication listing all African music and films registered in the US is released periodically in order to put people on notice of the works’ copyrights. And following in the footsteps of the Nigerian Copyright Commission, films registered in the US receive a hologram sticker notifying buyers of the work’s copyright.
DMCA Takedowns
The DMCA, Digital Millennium Copyright Act, refers to provisions in the US Copyright Act that allow copyright holders to stop infringements occurring online. One important provision allows the copyright holder to work with third-party websites that host content to remove posted material that infringes the copyright holder’s work. The copyright owner submits a notice to the website where the infringing material was found. The website removes the content from the site, a take-down, and notifies the user who posted the content that the material was removed based on allegations of copyright infringement. This process is, perhaps not very creatively, called “notice and takedown.” From here, it gets a bit more complicated and we’ll leave that for another blog. Another important provision allows copyright holders to request information from ISPs in order to identify the people or entities behind infringing websites. Identifying the infringer is an important step as it lets the copyright holder know who to sue.
There are a number of websites online where one can easily find Nollywood films for streaming and downloading. A good number of these sites are providing the films without the permission of the copyright owner. African Artists Collaborative is helping artists obtain information from ISPs and remove infringing content from the internet. Infringing content has been removed from over 50 sites and “AAC has identified at least 14 habitual offenders that we hope can be prosecuted in the near future.” Afro-Leo would like to note here that this sentence is a little misguided as posting infringing material online is a usually a civil liability issue and only a crime under certain circumstances. (See Sec. 504 (false domain name registration), 506 (for profit distribution with minimum value requirement) & 1201 (circumventing technical protection measures) of the US Copyright Act.)
Civil Suits
Most copyright infringement in the US is a civil action, a conflict between the copyright holder and the infringer. In order to help with civil infringement suits, African Artists Collaborative assists artists with the sending of cease and desist letters to infringers. Cease and desist letters are the first step in the road to a civil copyright infringement law suit. Though the report does not say so, Afro-Leo guess that PIIPA also helps match pro-bono attorneys to artists to assist with these actions. FAN USA also hopes to match artists with firms to handle actual litigation against these infringers. As most US states allow contingency fees, this is a chance for attorneys to assist without that pro bono tag.
Criminal Enforcement
One of the major activities highlighted by the report is a raid of stores selling infringing Nollywood movies in Kings County, New York City, New York. Afro-Leo was very surprised to read about these raids and about the Kings County District Attorney’s involvement in conducting the raids. She hardly ever hears of such things happening in the US and other than one case in her copyright law textbook (about secondary liability) cannot think of a specific instance of such occurring in the US. Either store raids for infringing goods are very infrequent, or they aren’t the national news story in the US that they are in Nigeria.
Although, Afro-Leo’s understanding is that District Attorneys’ offices usually focus on prosecution after the police have made arrests, not on enforcing the law in the streets, the King’s County DA’s office seems to be more active in enforcement (about 2/3s way down the page) and crime prevention. It even has community contact centers where people can report instances of copyright infringement and other suspect crimes.
FAN USA is very proud of its work in helping conduct this raid. The website showcases a number of pictures from the press conference afterwards. If it weren’t for the muzungu District Attorney in the center of the photos, Afro-Leo would swear they were taken in Nigeria. Congratulations to African Artists Collaborative and FAN USA for producing such a successful raid.
Afro-Leo’s Concern: Mis-information
While the work being done by PIIPA, FAN USA and the African Artists Collaborative is proving to be very beneficial to African artists, the report released by PIIPA and the FAN USA website raise some concerns for Afro-Leo. Despite the promotion of IP education for African artists, there is still a lot of misinformation presented.
The FAN USA website instructs artists to register their copyrights with the US Patent & Trademark Office. Afro-Leo can guarantee that this will not work as the US Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO) handles only, you guessed it, patents and trademarks. Copyright registrations are handled by, you probably guessed it again, the US Copyright Office.
Glosses over the distinction between crimes and civil matters are common in both the report and materials provided on the FAN USA website. Unfortunately, this is not at all unique in the US or Nigeria. Afro-Leo also wishes the report would make a clearer distinction between having a copyright and registering a copyright, but again, this is another often confused concept.
IMPORTANT NOTE: These misunderstandings are most likely not the responsibility of PIIPA. Although PIIPA released the report, it appears to have been written by a FAN USA board member (though this is not entirely clear from the report itself). From Afro-Leo’s experience with PIIPA, it is a very professional organization with knowledgeable and experienced attorneys.
Accessing the Full Report
The full 4-page report is available in pdf form under a CC BY-NC-ND license, which means that you can download, print, email, share and distribute however you see fit to all your friends as long as you don’t do so in a way that is primarily designed to give you a commercial benefit (ie don’t sell it), and you don’t make any changes to the document.
Friday, 3 December 2010

Fighting Piracy with Quality
Zambian newspaper The Post recently ran a story about the release of new gospel albums and videos from label Doxa Music. Normally, that sort of thing wouldn’t be of much interest for those thinking about the legal side of intellectual property. However, there’s an interesting side to this story.
The Zambian Association of Musicians (ZAM) and the Zambia Copyright Protection Society (ZAMCOPS) both gave Doxa Music recognition for its approach to fighting piracy in Zambia. Doxa’s weapon in that fight? Quality. According to The Post, “the Christian music label has been a leading production house in as far as quality was concerned.”
This high level of quality should not only give consumers an incentive to buy the original product but should also help consumers distinguish between originals and pirated copies.
Afro-Leo recognizes that this method of fighting piracy may not work in countries with more advanced pirating facilities, such as Nigeria. But, it is good to hear that in Zambia the fight against piracy is producing better goods for consumers and encouraging labels to take pride in their products.
Tuesday, 2 February 2010

Nigerian Piracy Case Moves Forward
The Nigerian national papers are abuzz with the news. The “King of Pirates”, Tony Onwujewekwe, has been arraigned before the Federal High Court in Lagos. It’s such big news that even the BBC has reported on it (audio story).
Alaba Market
Tony Onwujewekwe is a business man active in Alaba Market. Alaba Market is one of the largest markets on the West African coast. People travel from all across Nigeria and from many neighboring countries to shop in the large Lagos market. Throughout the past decade, Alaba has been a thorn in the side of the Nigerian Copyright Commission (NCC), the Nollywood industry and the Nigerian music industry. The market is notorious for its pirated goods. Shoppers can find cheap video discs of even the most newly released Nigerian and international films. Music cds go for USD $.50 to $1. Alaba isn’t only popular because of its low prices, but also because it is often the only place to find some of the top entertainment products. (See Nollyzone for an account of attempt to build an alternative to Alaba.)
The NCC has conducted a number of raids on Alaba market over the years, some of them resulting in severe injuries to police officers when the market sellers fought back. By 2008, the NCC had negotiated a memorandum of understanding with Alaba sellers who dealt in legitimate goods. This lead to attacks by pirate sellers against the legitimate sellers. Fear rose and piracy in Alaba did not abate.
Arrest and Prosecution of Tony Onwujewekwe
Last November, the NCC again went to Alaba. This time, they arrested the man they believe to be the king pin in Alaba’s piracy business, the so called King of Pirates. (World Premier Entertainment has an account of the proceedings leading up to the arrest on its blog.) The arraignment was yesterday. This will be an interesting case to watch going forward.
The Charges
According to The Punch, Tony Onwujewekwe is charged with three counts of violating the Nigerian Copyright Act. One count under Section 20(1)(a) – criminal liability for making for infringing copies of works for sale or causing them to be made for sale -, one count under 20(2)(a) – selling or leasing infringing copies of works - and one count under 20(2)(c) – possessing infringing copies of works for non-personal use.
Potential Punishment
For those who are interested, the statute requires Mr. Onwujewekwe to prove he did not know or had no reason to know the copies were infringing, otherwise he is guilty under Section 20. The punishment listed in the statute for violations of Section 20(2) is a fine of N100 for each infringing copy, up to two years in prison, or both. Violations of Section 20(1) are punishable by a fine of up to N1,000 for each infringing copy, up to five years in prison, or both.
Update 10, Feb. 2010 The Sun has reported that Mr. Onwujewekwe is to remain in custody at least until his bail hearing on 18th February. The trial is set for 23 February.
Friday, 17 July 2009

Updates on Battling Copyright Piracy in Nigeria
The Nigerian newspapers have been filled lately with new activities in the ongoing fight against copyright piracy in Nigeria. Here is a brief summary of some of those activities.
Book Publishing
The Daily Sun reports that lawyer Job Dangana has opened his own publishing shop. Currently focusing on publishing textbooks, Dangana believes that his publishing company can help fight piracy by producing quality books at reasonable prices. Pirated books are generally easy to spot in Nigeria, being of very low quality. However, the high prices of legitimate books, especially textbooks, often make them out of reach for the average purchaser. While Dangan is not aiming to make himself rich, it is hoped his business will add to the strengthening of a legitimate book industry in Nigeria. Dangan’s immediate goal is to help students in Nigeria:
My focus in publishing is not primarily to make money but to produce high quality books that could lay solid foundation for the future of students.
Teaming up with Customs and Police Forces
Reported by This Day, the Nigerian Copyright Commission is building partnerships with the Nigerian Police Force and the Nigerian Customs Service in the ongoing battle against piracy. These partnerships help the Commission by enabling action at ports where infringing goods may be entering or leaving the country, as well as at the source of the infringing materials. Director General of the Commission, Adebambo Adewapo explained the relationship between the agencies:
…the Commission will always rely on their respective active support and collaboration in the anti-piracy campaign…
Introduction of Source Identification Code
The Nigerian Copyright Commission has introduced a new technical piece in the battle against copyright infringement. The Source Identification Code, called SID for short, identifies where an optical disc (used for either CDs, DVDs or VCDs) was pressed. According to The Times of Nigeria, this type of system has been in use around the world since the mid 1990s. In Nigeria, it is hope that using SID codes will help identify products coming from unregistered optical disc plants, believed to be the main source of infringing CDs and DVDs within the country.
Trial to Begin in Case of Exporting Infringing CDs
Back in May, Afro-Leo reported on a Nigerian business man who was accused of attempting to import infringing CDs into South Africa. The Vanguard tells us that the trial began at the end of June, as expected. Interesting to those of us who are familiar with cases involving subpoenas of text records from cell phone companies, the accused’s cell phone text messages were allowed into evidence, but the messages were not obtained from the cell phone company’s records. Rather, a witness from the Nigerian Copyright Commission transcribed messages stored on the cell phone at the time it was taken from the accused.