The SA Times reports that a Vodacom ex-employee is planning to sue the network operator. He apparently alleges that he was inadequately compensated for the development of the 'please call me' text service, which asks recipients to call the sender. From a legal viewpoint, one hopes that the matter proceeds to hearing, as decisions on ownership in the South African copyright context are rather thin on the ground.
ABOUT THE EDITOR
Firi Abibirem, da biara asɛm foforɔ.
Popular Posts
-
Van's Aircraft is a very successful producer of experimental aircraft and aircraft kits based in the US. Their fleet of RVs (as they ar... -
Using RSA as an example, this post makes a case for a more simplified approach to the trade mark infringement test. It recommends that the ... -
South Africa: In the case of Fire Logic (Pty) Ltd (Fire Logic) v Logic Group Africa (Pty) Ltd t/a Firelogik (Logic Africa) , the Eastern ... -
Last week I spent time in Botswana for a hearing. It also gave me an opportunity to pilot my first international flight. It’s a wonderful th...
-
INTRODUCTION When a trade mark rights holder (statutory/common law), is estopped, on the way to the forum, or anywhere else, from act...
IPKAT APPROVED
1 comments:
Write commentsRoshana,
ReplyThis is an interesting case. I would have imagined that the contract of employment with such a company would spell out issues of who owns the intellectual property developed while an employee is still under contract. Is there a general rule that could be followed in SA where no contract exists?