An important case just published today on the use of
class headings in Europe can be located here – IPTranslator
The case was instigated by the Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys in the UK when their mark IP TRANSLATOR was rejected because their class heading (41) spec was deemed to cover all services in the class which included “translation services”.
Questions over the interpretation of the Nice Classification
were referred to the ECJ and observations were made by over 10 governments as
well as the EU Commission and OHIM. It is of significant importance in Europe because
OHIM’s practice to allow class headings was inconsistent with the practice of
some Member States.
The ruling by a Court of 12! (CIPC would love that type of attention right now)
1.
Goods and services for which the protection of
the trade mark is sought to be identified by the applicant with sufficient
clarity and precision to enable the competent authorities and economic
operators, on that basis alone, to determine the extent of the protection
conferred by the trade mark.
2.
Class
headings are allowed provided that such
identification is sufficiently clear and precise.
3.
Where class headings are used they must specify whether it is intended to cover all the goods or services
included in the alphabetical list of that class or only some of those goods or
services. If the application concerns only some of those goods or services, the
applicant is required to specify which of the goods or services in that class
are intended to be covered.
The decision is unlikely to affect RSA specifications except
perhaps those where priority is claimed from marks filed in Europe because
partial priority is not allowed here, and expressions such as “all goods in the
class” (if contemplated by 3. above) may not be acceptable. For RSA filers into
Europe, if we apply our own test we should be fine. For the rest of Africa, the ECJ analysis provides a good explanation on interpretation of the Nice Classification and also how it works within the context of an EU wide directive(s).
2 comments
Write commentsLink to the case wouldn't work for me, but this one does: http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=124102&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=4020201
Replyor http://is.gd/kEplOT
thanks Charles, I have amended the link.
Reply