
Access to medicine: a new approach?
The statement further clarifies, "Under this policy Janssen will not enforce its darunavir patent rights, provided the generic versions of darunavir produced or supplied by generic manufacturers are quality, medically acceptable, and used only in the defined territory. Manufacturers are still responsible for obtaining permissions from other darunavir patent holders and health authorities where appropriate. Janssen will continue to ensure the availability and appropriate use of PREZISTA® in SSA and LDCs through its existing licensing agreement and partnerships."(Please be aware that nothing comes for free, says Afro Leo)
This Leo applauds this initiative by J&J and feels that perhaps, it may mitigate the company's stance not to join the patent pool. It is also quite interesting that J&J is open about the fact that IP can, in some instances, be a barrier to the access to certain essential medicines. (This is the sort of news that makes Afro Leo wonder whether there should be more focus or energy on lobbying pharmaceutical giants to change their ways - not forgetting to ensure African countries utilise inherent flexibilities in IP laws).
What do readers think of J&J's new policy? Ultimately, does it go far enough?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
J&J recalls HIV/AIDS medicine PREZISTA®
(darunavir) in 2011, see here