In what will come as a surprise to many, the South
African Department of Trade and Industry has just published the Copyright Amendment Bill 2015 for public
comment.
The
Bill is clearly informed by 2011’s report by the Copyright Review Commission as
well as the Draft National Policy on Intellectual Property of 2013 and
contains some sweeping amendments to our geriatric Copyright Act, the amendment
of which has been long overdue.
Some
of the more significant amendments are as follows:
- The introduction of a new class of works eligible for copyright,
being “craft works” such as pottery, jewellery and folk-art;
- The introduction of an EU style resale royalty right for
artistic works in terms of which artists are to be afforded royalties
whenever their original works are resold (section 6);
- The addition of an exception to infringement for non-commercial
translations and provision for obtaining a licence to make a translation
of a work from the Copyright Tribunal against payment of “just
compensation” (section 14 and Schedule A);
- The introduction of a “fair use” exception, albeit only in limited
circumstances such as parody, criticism, professional advice etc.
Interestingly, the four well-known US factors for fair use have
been incorporated, in addition to one other (section 14);
- A provision that appears to put an end to brand holders restraining
parallel imports (grey goods) through copyright infringement proceedings (see
proposed section 12A(7)) inserted by section 14 of the amendment bill);
- The wholesale inclusion of the temporary copying exception included
in article 5 of the EU Copyright Directive
(section 15);
- Exceptions for libraries, museums, galleries and people with
disabilities (sections 22);
- The creation of moral rights for performers and some apparent
repetition of rights already granted to performers in terms of the
Performers’ Protection Act (section 24);
- Provisions for the licensing of orphan
works, including the assignment of all orphan works to the
state (sections 25 and 27);
- A provision providing that any copyright owned by the state cannot
be assigned (section 26(a));
- Providing that all copyright assignments shall be valid for 25
years only (section 26(b));
- The creation of a whole host of new criminal offences, including
one for a failure to pay royalties (section 28);
- The criminalisation of technological protection measure circumvention,
which is already criminalised by section 86 of the Electronic
Communications and Transactions Act (section 29) ; and
- An interesting provision that outlaws contractual provisions that
purport to restrict or prevent any conduct that would not infringe copyright,
e.g. contractual provisions forbidding conduct that would otherwise be
covered by an exception. This is particularly relevant to software
End User Licence Agreements (EULAs) that often restrict on-sale of the
particular software package, where this would not ordinarily infringe
copyright. (section 37).
The
Bill is open to public comment until 26 August, but given the breadth of the
amendments, I suspect that far more time will be required!
Correction: The deadline for public comment was previously stated to be 27 August, as per the Government's website here. Andrè Myburgh has however astutely pointed out that the correct deadline is 30 days from the publication date, making the deadline 26 August by my calculation.