Showing posts with label ANC infringement allegations. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ANC infringement allegations. Show all posts

Friday, 12 December 2008

Darren Olivier

ANC v COPE -- what is your verdict?

STOP PRESS -- Judgment due out at 11.30 am SA time today. Cast your vote asap alongside..

Yesterday we reported, to the disappointment of Afro-IP, that the High Court had reserved its judgement in the ANC v COPE matter . It occurs to Afro-IP that our audience, given the papers, may well be able to come to their own conclusion (quicker that the Court) or wish to pit their skills against the impending High Court decision and other readers. To enable you to do so we have set up the decision poll alongside. It's completely anonymous so take a few minutes and hand down your own decision.

In order to prepare, you can review the numerous media reports (including letters exchanged between the parties) and the actual evidence and arguments filed by the parties here. Following yesterday's post, Jeremy Speres, an alert final year LLB student at UCT, pointed out that the heads of argument filed by the ANC and the affidavit filed by COPE can be located here:

ANC Heads of Argument

The COPE Affidavit
Read More

Thursday, 11 December 2008

Darren Olivier

Judgment reserved in ANC v Cope name battle

Sapa reports that The Pretoria High Court yesterday reserved judgment on the ANC’s efforts to stop the country’s newest political party from using the name "Congress of the People." No time frame for the resumption of the matter was given. Earlier yesterday, advocate Cedric Puckrin SC (acting for Cope) referred to the ANC’s heads of arguments as "short and scanty on the facts". He said the ANC had failed to show that Cope was misrepresenting itself as the sole heir to the 1955 congress, the Congress of the People. Meanwhile the Independent Electoral Commission withdrew from the matter after reaching an agreement with the ANC. The ANC was opposing Cope’s choice of name on the grounds that no party or person could appropriate the name of 1955’s Congress of the People, at which the Freedom Charter was adopted. For earlier postings on this intriguing matter, click here.

Reserving judgement with no time frame for the decision (which is how I read the report) is about as much of a let down as punching a pillow. If anyone has a copy of the heads of argument filed by the ANC, please could they email them here.
Read More

Friday, 28 November 2008

Darren Olivier

Friday Sightings

Quote of the week:

“They (India) attracted the pharmaceutical industry from South Africa, and international designer labels are manufacturing in India. India has clamped down on piracy. If we (South Africa) want to be winners we must do what winners do.” Leon Louw, executive director of the Free Market Foundation.

Algeria Pharmaceuticals and Healthcare Report:

"Algeria's [positive] score for risks to potential returns is negatively impacted by the government's strong pro-generics stance and shortcomings of the country's intellectual property rights (IPR) regime."

ANC v COPE: Congress of the People fight - focus shifts away from IP

"The ANC (originally) inferred that it owned the trademark rights to the name, but it appears it has abandoned this argument," Deon Bouwer (acting for COPE). For the earlier Afro-IP prediction post click here. IOL reports that "the interdict was [now] being sought on the basis that COPE should be prevented from using its name because it was "unlawful" and falsely represented the party as the "exclusive successor" to the 1955 Kliptown Congress of the People, at which the Freedom Charter was adopted." The case is set down for 8-12 December.

Recession..what Recession?

IP Finance recently quoted stats from the USPTO and OHIM offices that trade mark filings are set for another record year in Europe and the US but questions whether this can continue. A cursory view of filings in South Africa indicates that filings have not dropped in Africa's most advanced IP market either....(yet?). South Africa has the added advantage that its currency acts as a buffer. Bad news drops the rate making it cheaper to file...depending, of course, on whether your trade mark attorney passes that saving on.
Read More

Tuesday, 25 November 2008

Darren Olivier

Tune in for live ANC v COPE name battle

It is very rare that action in a trade mark fight is broadcast blow-by-blow. That's why the much talked about political name battle between the ANC and COPE (South Africa's new breakaway party) is intriguingly good news for the RSA trade mark profession and the firms involved. The ANC have taken issue with the terms "Congress of the People" threatening urgent High Court action and COPE have fiercely resisted. Both parties have used their lawyers and the press to communicate their position (see below) and by strange co-incidence, the ANC has pitted Adams & Adams chairman Chris Job against Bouwers boss Deon Bouwer. For those who do not know the RSA legal profession, Adams & Adams is almost as dominant as the ANC and Bouwers is a young splinter firm from DM Kisch, not unlike COPE. For what it is worth, if this goes to Court my money is on the splinter groups this time...but make your own minds up:

Cope Refuses ANC's Demand for a Name Change

"The Congress of the People was a "seminal, historical event" in 1955 organised by the ANC and its congress alliance partners, which led to the adoption of the Freedom Charter, said ANC spokesperson Carl Niehaus. A letter from the ANC stated: "We believe we enjoy common law [ed - rights] in and to the name Congress of the People. "The ANC is also concerned about the fact that "in many political circles, the ANC is commonly referred to as the Congress of the People". The Nguni translation of the ANC is "khongolese", which means congress. "The consequence of this is that there will be serious confusion," said Niehaus. The letter asked Cope for an undertaking in writing that it would not use the name or any similar names and that no promotional or advertising material bear the name. The ANC "requests delivery of all material in their possession for destruction". "If they do not abide by this we will be entitled to institute urgent high court proceedings," said Niehaus. Job said on both sides affidavits and answering affidavits had not been filed yet. He said the matter may eventually become moot."

"Job says the ANC has no problem with the use of the word congress, or the acronym, Cope, but that the phrase, Congress of the People, cannot be used according to this article."

According to The Star Motlanthe enters COPE fray

"When you look at the ANC's historical documents on their website there is no instance where they claim the name Congress of the People. "That is a historic event and is not the sole property of the ANC," said Bouwer. In a letter to the ANC on behalf of COPE, Bouwer questioned why the ANC wanted to go to court when the Independent Electoral Commission (IEC) was already engaged in examining COPE's application to register as a political party.

Chris Job, said COPE's refusal to accede to the ANC's demand made high court action "inevitable". "We will apply for an urgent interdict at the Pretoria High Court as early as next week," he said. We want to have a court hearing as soon as possible. We want the hearing to be heard before December 16. "We want to move urgently on this matter," Job said. The ANC would object to COPE's registration as a company and its applications to register its trademark and as a political party, he said.

Bouwer said this was premature, "because the IEC and the registrar of trademarks have not completed their processes". "The ANC should have waited to object to the IEC and the registrar of trademarks. Why did they have to go to court? "Although COPE has registered as a company with (the companies' register) Cipro, the ANC has a year in which they can still object to it. "The process to register a trademark takes up to two years and... the registrar of companies can still order COPE to use another name if a third party objects in the next 12 months," said Bouwer. He said the ANC should follow the rules and lodge its complaints with the IEC, and the registrars of companies and trademarks. "We are saying to the ANC: don't suppress us, but follow the rules. We have nothing against objections but this (squabble over the name) is not an urgent matter for the court. "I would be surprised if the court saw this matter as urgent, because the IEC and relevant bodies are dealing with the applications," Bouwer.

Deon Bouwer's letter can be located here

COPE Court Battle Looms Sibusiso Ngalwa and Gaye Davis

An SMS sent by former ANC Youth League leader and COPE organiser, Andile Nkuhlu, read: "Dear colleagues. This serves as information that the ANC has served papers on us to give an undertaking not to use Congress of the People in any form or they'll go to court on the 20th. Have told the lawyers to tell (them) to go to court since we will continue to use the name!"

"Jessie Duarte said the party took strong exception to the fact that the dissidents had decided to name themselves after the 1955 Congress of the People at Kliptown, Soweto - a campaign that was led by the ANC and which saw the adoption of the Freedom Charter. Duarte has accused Cope of trying to "steal" the legacy of the Freedom Charter, the document that forms the basis for the ANC's values and principles."

COPE has sent ANC into Panic Onkgopotse Tabane

"the ANC must explain why it is abusing the courts to oppose names that have not been registered; why it is blocking registration of domain names all over the place, including attempting to intimidate the Companies and Intellectual Property Registration Office officials to reveal names of people who are registering various aspects of the Cope identity. It would be interesting to understand why parallel rallies and events are being organised in an attempt to dislodge this "non-threat"."

Afro-IP's earlier post on the choice of SANC.
Read More

Wednesday, 5 November 2008

roshana

semper aliquid novus!

Even in trade-mark matters, we do it differently in Africa. The political flurries of the past week in South Africa held the prospect of a trade-mark battle of epic proportions, for nothing less than the ANC (African National Congress), or at least its acronym. The ANC breakaway party was allegedly intending to call itself the SANC (South African National Convention), and this provoked urgent proceedings to interdict use of this name, on the day before the conference at which the new party was to be formed. According to the South African Sunday Times of 2 November 2008, the founding affidavit of ANC secretary-general Gwede Mantashe alleged that the proposed name would ‘confuse or deceive the public’, including donors and potential donors, into thinking that the new party was connected with the ANC. He stated that this amounted to trademark infringement, and that ‘their conduct is likely to take unfair advantage of the distinctive character and reputation of the trademarks. It will create a chaotic and disrupted situation’.
The matter was postponed for a week to allow the Independent Electoral Commission to be joined in the proceedings. But next day, at the conference, the new party’s name was announced as Sadec (South African Democratic Congress) and the prospects of a good trade-mark fight appeared remote.
However, hope arrived on Monday in the form of Sadeco (also South African National Congress), a splinter party of (Nadeco), the National Democratic Convention, both of whom have already registered their names with the IEC. This party has apparently refused to allow the breakaway party to adopt their name.
For the breakaways to be third time lucky in their choice of a new name, it might be a good idea to stay away from the terms ‘African’ National’ and ‘Democratic’!
Fortunately for the South African Nurses Council (SANC), the Southern African Development Community (SADC or Sadec) and the South African Disability Empowerment Company (Sadeco), the principle of specificity still reigns in trade-mark law.
Read More